Login | Register | Subscribe to the GG RSS Feed

British Airways Crash - Engine Failure

1
2
3
4
5

What does this mean for the more than 700 Boeing 777s currently in service?

Boeing 777 in Trouble?Boeing 777 in Trouble?Last week a Boeing 777 crashed at Heathrow Airport - the first Boeing 777 to crash. First Officer John Coward and the pilot, Peter Burkill, are being lauded as heroes for landing the jet just short of the runway with no fatalities.

Investigators are now citing engine failure as the cause.

Here's what happened. Nearing the runway, the plane's computer-controlled throttle attempted to increase engine power. The engines didn't respond and the throttle made a second attempt.

The flight crew then took over and attempted to ABC News PhotoABC News Photoincrease power manually. No response again. Coward steered plane over homes and a busy freeway to the runway where it slammed into the ground.

Miraculously, almost everyone walked off the plane - 1 person was admitted to hospital overnight.

What does this mean for the more than 700 Boeing 777s currently in service?

There are only a small number of ways both engines can fail at once - failure to deliver fuel to the engines, electronic malfunction or pilot error.

Or it could have been sabotage - which is an entirely different kettle of fish. Thankfully, the FBI ruled out terrorism fairly quickly.

Investigators could take up to 2 years to conclude what caused this crash and if other Boeings are at risk. Until then, pilots steering the 700 or so Boeing 777s will have another safety issue on their checklist.

And so will those of us who fly frequently.

For now, we can be thankful Coward and Burkill's flight crew kept their heads and steered a useless chunk of malfunctioning technology to the ground safely.

Talk Back, Girlfriend and rate this post!

Rate This Post

Average: 2 (1 vote)

Trackback URL for this post:

http://www.gogirlfriend.com/trackback/549

Bookmark This Post



Comments

Being a pilot myself it's

Being a pilot myself it's hard for me to believe that both engines just decided to quit both at the same time. Being the most modern aircraft in the Boeing fleet, it was designed with duplictated independent systems to control almost all critical systems. The way i see it weather was not a contributing factor. I hate to jump to conclusions but i have a strong feeling that they just simply starved the engines of fuel. The biggest concern in the airline industry at present is fuel price. The Management and accountants running the show are always pushing the pilots especially, to reduce uplift of fuel. They do this through reduction in 'contingency fuel' which is normally included in the fuel order to cater for inflight inaccuracies in the fuel planning. It is not uncommon to have the fuel running low after a long haul flight due to inaccurate forecast weather data used in the flight planning. That is exactly why the contigency fuel is catered for. I dare not speculate on the procedures that British Airways adopts in their 'Fuel Policy' but as a pilot we feel the crunch when it's time to order the fuel.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Register

Membership is free and with it you can set up a profile, vote on stories and post your opinions.

Already a member?
Login
Not a member? Join!
Register

Most Recent Comments

  • On Hurricane Fay - Hype or Hurricane?, Anonymous said "I disagree - the point is that some people aren't immune to the media hype - and that's why news outlets continue to cover non-stories like this. Granted tropical storms can be deadly but a little common sense (like the author said about the governer's advice) will go a long way to getting through ANY storm safely. I still wouldn't travel south right now - who wants their vacation ruined by something like this? But, I wouldn't take an Alaskan cruise in the dead of winter. It's that whole common sense thing again. Good post - and great discussion!"

  • On Hurricane Fay - Hype or Hurricane?, Anonymous said "In this case, it could be a lot of hype. I'm not down there, so I can't say for certain. Canada and the US are much better at weathering these types of storms (no pun intended) due to better communications and infrastructure. And their size... Tropical storms can devastate island countries. But I think the rest of this post is a little off the mark. Tropical storms don't need to turn into "real hurricanes" to be deadly because it isn't just about the wind speed. Last year, hundreds of people died in the Caribbean due to tropical storms because of flooding and landslides caused by torrential rains. Oh, and then there's widespread water-borne diseases and severe damage to roads and other infrastructure... Deaths from bad judgment happen in snow storms as well as tropical storms. Nothing new there. Overall, if people were smarter about the weather, then they would make better decisions. In which case, education about storm preparedness is better than media hype which people are immune to."

  • On Hurricane Fay - Hype or Hurricane?, Category 3's My Limit said "I agree - this is all hype. I'm not saying it's okay to wait as long as some people did in New Orleans, but this kind of panic is just silly. It's as if the media doesn't have enough to write about so a little storm like Fay becomes a feeding frenzy. The gov. is right. Use some common sense, but don't panic. Oh, and the beaches are still great here this time of year!"

  • On Hurricane Fay - Hype or Hurricane?, Anonymous said "If your friend doesn't evacuate until a hurricane is a Category 4, I hope you know that your friend won't be around for long! A Category 4 is what took out New Orleans with Katrina, and Miami with Andrew. "

  • On Blog Action Day - Calling all Girlfriend Travelers, Karen said "i agree - great idea! btw - i love the story you did on slum tourism. i'm not sure i agree it's the crassest way to travel but it makes you wonder if our tourism dollars do more harm than good."


Your Ad Here


Your Ad Here